RAG Quality Calculator

Evaluate RAG response quality with RAGAS metrics: Faithfulness, Relevancy, Precision, and Recall.

How It Works

  1. Enter your data: Paste the question, retrieved context, and response generated by your RAG system.
  2. Automatic analysis: Our algorithm calculates the 4 RAGAS metrics: faithfulness, relevancy, precision, and recall.
  3. Interpret results: Identify weaknesses in your pipeline and get improvement recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the RAGAS score?
RAGAS (Retrieval-Augmented Generation Assessment) is an open-source framework for evaluating RAG systems. It measures 4 dimensions: faithfulness (no hallucinations), answer relevancy, context precision, and context recall.
How can I improve my faithfulness score?
A low faithfulness score indicates hallucinations. To improve it: 1) Increase relevant context quantity, 2) Use a system prompt that emphasizes citations, 3) Reduce LLM temperature, 4) Switch to a more capable model like GPT-4 or Claude.
What's the difference between context precision and recall?
Precision measures if retrieved documents are relevant (avoid noise). Recall measures if all necessary documents were retrieved (avoid gaps). A good RAG system must optimize both.
What score should I target for a production RAG system?
Target an overall score above 0.7 for general use. For critical cases (medical, legal), aim for 0.85+. Faithfulness is the priority metric as it measures absence of hallucinations.
How does this tool calculate scores?
The tool uses heuristics based on text analysis: keyword overlap, entity detection, semantic structure analysis. For more accurate production evaluation, use the RAGAS library with an LLM judge.
Can I use this tool to evaluate ChatGPT or Claude?
This tool is designed for RAG systems where you control the context. For evaluating ChatGPT/Claude in standard mode (without RAG), context precision/recall metrics don't apply.

Score it

Evaluate your RAG response quality with RAGAS metrics

Ailog measures these metrics continuously.

Try it

How It Works

  1. 1

    Enter your data

    Paste the question, retrieved context, and response generated by your RAG system.

  2. 2

    Automatic analysis

    Our algorithm calculates the 4 RAGAS metrics: faithfulness, relevancy, precision, and recall.

  3. 3

    Interpret results

    Identify weaknesses in your pipeline and get improvement recommendations.

More Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

RAGAS (Retrieval-Augmented Generation Assessment) is an open-source framework for evaluating RAG systems. It measures 4 dimensions: faithfulness (no hallucinations), answer relevancy, context precision, and context recall.

A low faithfulness score indicates hallucinations. To improve it: 1) Increase relevant context quantity, 2) Use a system prompt that emphasizes citations, 3) Reduce LLM temperature, 4) Switch to a more capable model like GPT-4 or Claude.

Precision measures if retrieved documents are relevant (avoid noise). Recall measures if all necessary documents were retrieved (avoid gaps). A good RAG system must optimize both.

Target an overall score above 0.7 for general use. For critical cases (medical, legal), aim for 0.85+. Faithfulness is the priority metric as it measures absence of hallucinations.

The tool uses heuristics based on text analysis: keyword overlap, entity detection, semantic structure analysis. For more accurate production evaluation, use the RAGAS library with an LLM judge.

This tool is designed for RAG systems where you control the context. For evaluating ChatGPT/Claude in standard mode (without RAG), context precision/recall metrics don't apply.