étude de casLegal Services

LegalFirst: 80% Faster Contract Research with RAG Document Intelligence

LegalFirst Cabinet
20 janvier 2025
8 min read
Résultats Clés
80% faster research
€200K productivity gains
4x more cases handled

How law firm LegalFirst reduced legal research time by 80% using RAG to instantly search across thousands of contracts and legal documents.

Company Overview

LegalFirst is a mid-size French law firm specializing in business law, with 25 lawyers and 8 paralegals. They manage 500+ active cases and maintain an archive of 15,000+ contracts and legal documents accumulated over 12 years.

The Challenge

The Document Maze

  • 15,000+ documents spread across file servers
  • Average time to find relevant precedent: 45 minutes
  • Junior lawyers spent 60% of time on document research
  • Critical clauses often missed in complex contracts

Specific Pain Points

Contract Review

  • Manual review of 200-page contracts took 8+ hours
  • Clause comparison across similar contracts was nearly impossible
  • Risk of missing conflicting terms or unusual provisions

Case Precedent Research

  • Finding relevant past cases required senior lawyer knowledge
  • Institutional memory lost when lawyers left the firm
  • Duplicate work on similar legal questions

Due Diligence

  • M&A due diligence overwhelmed the team
  • Tight deadlines with hundreds of documents to review
  • High stakes for missing critical information

The Solution: RAG Legal Assistant

LegalFirst implemented Ailog's RAG platform to create an intelligent document search system:

Document Corpus

  • 15,000+ contracts (PDF and DOCX)
  • 3,000+ legal memos and opinions
  • 500+ court decisions and case files
  • Standard clause library (1,200 clauses)
  • Legal templates and checklists

Key Capabilities

Semantic Contract Search

  • "Find all contracts with change of control provisions"
  • "Show indemnification clauses exceeding €1M"
  • "Which contracts have non-compete durations over 2 years?"

Cross-Document Analysis

  • Compare clauses across similar contracts
  • Identify unusual or non-standard terms
  • Flag potential conflicts between documents

Natural Language Queries

  • "What was our position on data processing liability in 2023?"
  • "Show me employment termination cases we won"
  • "Find contracts with Company X across all matters"

Implementation

Phase 1: Document Preparation (Weeks 1-2)

  • Audit and organize document archive
  • OCR for scanned documents (30% of corpus)
  • Metadata tagging (client, matter type, date, lawyer)

Phase 2: RAG Configuration (Weeks 3-4)

  • Legal-specific chunking (by clause and section)
  • Custom embeddings for legal terminology
  • Access controls by matter and confidentiality level

Phase 3: Training & Rollout (Weeks 5-6)

  • Training sessions for all lawyers and paralegals
  • Pilot with 5 active matters
  • Feedback integration and prompt refinement

Results After 6 Months

Research Efficiency

MetricBeforeAfterChange
Avg. research time45 min9 min-80%
Precedent found rate60%95%+58%
Junior lawyer research time60% of day25% of day-58%

Business Impact

MetricBeforeAfterChange
Cases handled per lawyer20/year32/year+60%
Billable hours per lawyer1,400/year1,680/year+20%
Client satisfaction score4.1/54.7/5+15%

Financial Impact

  • Productivity gains: €200,000/year (estimated billable hours recovered)
  • Faster turnaround: 30% quicker on average engagement
  • Reduced due diligence costs for clients

Use Case Examples

Contract Review Acceleration

Before: Junior lawyer spends 8 hours reviewing a 200-page acquisition agreement.

After: RAG assistant:

  1. Instantly identifies all material clauses (10 minutes)
  2. Compares representations & warranties to firm standard (15 minutes)
  3. Flags unusual provisions with similar clause examples (20 minutes)

Total time: 45 minutes + 2 hours senior review = 2.75 hours (65% reduction)

Due Diligence Transformation

Scenario: M&A due diligence on target with 500 contracts

Before: 3 lawyers, 4 weeks, €80,000 in fees

After:

  • RAG scans all contracts in 2 hours
  • Flags change of control, assignment, and termination clauses
  • Identifies 12 contracts requiring consent
  • Creates summary report automatically

Result: 2 lawyers, 2 weeks, €35,000 in fees (56% reduction)

Institutional Knowledge Preservation

A senior partner with 30 years of experience was retiring. Their knowledge of past cases and client relationships was irreplaceable.

Solution: All their memos, emails, and case notes were added to the RAG system. New associates can now query this knowledge:

"How did we structure the Dupont acquisition financing in 2018?"

The assistant retrieves relevant memos and explains the approach, preserving decades of expertise.

Technical Implementation

RAG Configuration

Documents: 18,700 (15,000 contracts + 3,700 memos)
Chunking: Legal-aware (section and clause boundaries)
Chunk size: 600 characters with 100 overlap
Embeddings: OpenAI text-embedding-3-large (legal accuracy)
Retrieval: Hybrid search with metadata filtering
LLM: GPT-4 Turbo with legal system prompt

Security & Compliance

  • All data processed in EU (GDPR compliance)
  • Role-based access control by matter
  • Audit logging for all queries
  • Client confidentiality barriers (Chinese walls)

Integration

  • Microsoft 365 integration (document sync)
  • iManage document management connection
  • Secure SSO authentication

ROI Analysis

Investment

  • Ailog Enterprise subscription: €500/month
  • Document preparation: €5,000 (one-time)
  • Training and rollout: €3,000 (one-time)

Annual Returns

  • Productivity gains (billable hours): €200,000
  • Junior lawyer efficiency: €50,000
  • Faster case delivery: €30,000

ROI: 35x in first year

Lawyer Testimonials

"I was skeptical about AI in legal work. But this isn't generating legal advice—it's finding information I know exists but couldn't locate. It's like having a perfect memory of every document we've ever produced."

Senior Partner, Corporate Law

"Due diligence used to be my nightmare. Now I can review a data room in a fraction of the time and actually focus on analyzing issues instead of hunting for documents."

Associate, M&A Practice

Lessons Learned

  1. Document quality matters - OCR quality and metadata directly impact retrieval accuracy
  2. Legal-specific chunking - Generic chunking breaks clauses; legal-aware splitting is essential
  3. Start with high-value use cases - Contract review and due diligence showed fastest ROI
  4. Maintain human oversight - RAG finds information; lawyers make judgments

Compliance Considerations

LegalFirst ensured:

  • Client consent for document processing where required
  • Data residency in France/EU
  • No training on client data (retrieval only)
  • Audit trails for regulatory compliance

Conclusion

For law firms drowning in documents, RAG isn't replacing lawyers—it's giving them superpowers. LegalFirst's 80% reduction in research time demonstrates that intelligent document search can transform legal practice.

The key is treating RAG as a research assistant, not a replacement for legal judgment.

Ready to modernize your legal practice? Contact Ailog for enterprise solutions with legal-specific features and compliance guarantees.


This case study is based on aggregated data from legal technology implementations. Firm name and some figures have been adjusted for confidentiality.

Tags

RAGlegaldocument analysiscontractslaw firmcase study

Prêt à transformer votre entreprise ?

Déployez un chatbot intelligent en 5 minutes avec Ailog RAG as a Service.

Essayer gratuitement

Articles connexes

Ailog Assistant

Ici pour vous aider

Salut ! Pose-moi des questions sur Ailog et comment intégrer votre RAG dans vos projets !